The Mohallel – Islam's version of "Please Bang my Wife"

June 30, 2008

Volume 3, Book 48, Number 807:
Narrated Aisha:
The wife of Rifa’a Al-Qurazi came to the Prophet and said, “I was Rifa’a’s wife, but he divorced me and it was a final irrevocable divorce. Then I married AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair but he is impotent.” The Prophet asked her ‘Do you want to remarry Rifa’a? You cannot unless you had a complete sexual relation with your present husband.” Abu Bakr was sitting with Allah’s Apostle and Khalid bin Said bin Al-‘As was at the door waiting to be admitted. He said, “O Abu Bakr! Do you hear what this (woman) is revealing frankly before the Prophet ?”

THe above passage is one of many Hadith verses that describe the Mohallel; another barbaric Islamic law.

This is when a man actually pays another man to marry his ex-wife for one night and have sex with her and divorce her the next day so that the two of them can remarry. In Islam a man has the unilateral right to divorce (by itself a violation of womens rights), under following procedures. A man can divorce his wife once, by telling her “I divorce you” and if they are faced with each other the divorce is nullified and they can resume normal relations. A man can divorce his wife twice, “I divorce you, I divorce you” and then if they have sexual intercourse the divorce is nullified and they can resume their marital relation. However, once a man divorces his wife three times “I divorce you, I divorce you, I divorce you” in presence of a witness. Then in order for them to get back together the man has to find a “Mohallel” a man who would marry his wife for one night and then divorce her so he and his ex-wife can go back together. Many times these Mohallels do not divorce the wife the next day. And there is nothing the ex-husband can do about it.

1) Did Mohammad create these rules so he could jerk of more, whence causing semen stains on his clothing? (
2) Which prophet would encourage rules that would utterly humiliate both husband and wife?
3) Was this an attempt for Mohammad to get more action with the wives of other men? (After all, Mohammad was known as quite a sex-pot – Tabari VIII:110 “When Abu Sufyan learned that the Prophet had taken her, he said, ‘That stallion’s nose is not to be restrained!'”
4) Which type of religious figures would encourage this lewd and licentious behaviour?
5) Did Bukhari and Sahih Muslim include stories of the Mohallel to show how depraved Mohammad was regarding rules of man and wife?



June 30, 2008

Creation Of The Heaven And Earth

“And no question do they bring to you but We reveal to you the truth and the best explanation” (Quran 25:33)

Which one was created first? As you will see in the verses below, Allah at one time says that Earth was created first and another time he says that the Heaven was created first.

Quran 2:29 It is He who hath created for you all things that are on Earth; THEN He turned to the Heaven and made them into seven firmaments (Skies)…

Quran 79:27-30 Are you the harder to create, or is the heaven that He built? He raised the height thereof and ordered it; and He has made dark the night thereof, and He brought forth the morning thereof. And after that, He spread (flattened) the earth

Now, does it match modern science? Do you believe that, Earth was created first, after that, God created Heaven? Modern science tells us that? Or How come SEVEN firmaments (layers)? Modern science tells us that, actually there is no such thing Sky is no “roof” over us. It is only a space with no known boundary at all. These verses simply reinforce the ancient idea of ROOF over us which is called SKY, is it not so? How funny!


The Holy Qur’an is full of inaccuracies, contradictions, inconsistencies, redundancies, no chronology or chapters, grammatical errors, etc. One can find hundreds of contradictions/errors/inconsistencies in the Holy Quran. The above-mentioned Ayats are just selected samples from the Quran. But still it is a miracle to those who are blindfolded bigots.


June 30, 2008

Numerical Contradictions

“And no question do they bring to you but We reveal to you the truth and the best explanation” (Quran 25:33)

There are many numerical contradictions in the Quran. Can God make so much error in doing simple calculations?

How many days did it take to create Heavens and Earth?

Quran 7:54 Your gurdian-Lord is Allah who created the heavens and earth in Six Days

Quran 10:3 Verily your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in Six Days

Quran 11:7 He it is Who created the heavens and earth in Six Days

Quran 25:29 He Who created the heavens and earth and all that is between, in Six Days

The above verses clearly state that God created the heaven and Allah created the heaven and the Earth in 6 days. But the verses below stated :

Quran 41:9 Is it that ye deny Him who created the earth in Two Days?

Quran 41:10 He set on the (earth) Mountains standing firm high above it, and bestowed blessing on the earth, and measured therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in FOUR DAYS

Quran 41:12 So He completed them (heavens) as seven firmaments in Two days and…

Now do the math: 2(for earth) + 4(for nourishment) + 2 (for heavens) = 8 days; and not 6 days

Similar mistakes you can see in the verse: Quran 4:11-12, and Quran 4:176 in inheritance law. In these verses one can see the total property after adding all distributed parties adds up more than the available property, i.e., totals become more than 1 which are: 1.125 and 1.25. How come? A gross mathematical errors, is not it?

Allah’s Days Equal to 1000 Years or 50,000 Years?

Quran 22:47 A day in the sight of the Lord is like a thousand years of your reckoning.

Quran 32:5 To Him, on a Day, the space whereof will be a thousands years of your rekoning

Quran 70:4 The angels and the spirit ascend unto him in a day the measure whereof is Fifty thousands years.

So, which one is it? Is the day of Allah equal to 1,000 earth years or 50,000 earth years?


The Holy Qur’an is full of inaccuracies, contradictions, inconsistencies, redundancies, no chronology or chapters, grammatical errors, etc. One can find hundreds of contradictions/errors/inconsistencies in the Holy Quran. The above-mentioned Ayats are just selected samples from the Quran. But still it is a miracle to those who are blindfolded bigots.

Thou Shalt Sacrifice Thy Family For The Good Of The Church! – Bible Secret 4

June 29, 2008


Christian Family Values?

One of the favorite pasttimes of conservative Christians is to wag their fingers at the rest of society, reprimanding secular and liberal Americans for abandoning what they call “family values”. They’d like us to believe that conservative Christians have better, more devoted lives with their families and that being liberal or unreligious is incompatible with happy family life.

Sometimes you’ve got to wonder what these holier-than-thous are talking about. For all the propaganda from right-wing Christian preachers about making the country safe for children, hardly a week goes by without some preacher getting arraigned for molesting the children of congregation members. As a matter of fact, the highest divorce rates in the country are not in the relatively liberal and secular regions of the Northeast and the West Coast, but in the Bible Belt states in the highly conservative and religious South.

Man Leaves Wife For The Pope

The absurdity of conservative Christianity’s claim to ownership of family values was demonstrated yet again this week by the announcement by the Vatican that it had been successful in its efforts to force a former archbishop to abandon his wife and reaffirm his faithful obedience to the Pope. Archbishop Milingo originally left the Catholic Church in order to marry a South Korean acupuncturist whom he had never met, but was chosen for him by the Reverend Moon, head of the ultra-conservative Unification Church. Milingo and his wife were married in a church-organized mass wedding in a hotel in New York City.

Reverend Phillip Schanker of the Unification Church’s Family Federation for World Peace and Unification made an official church announcement when Milingo and his new wife had sex for the first time. Now, Milingo’s wife says that she may have become pregnant just as he has left their home to reunite with the Pope, to whom he has written, “I am your humble and obedient servant.” She has not been allowed to see her husband who is reportedly confined within the walls of the Vatican, and considers him to be a prisoner of the Catholic Church. She has pledged to engage in a hunger strike until she is allowed to see him.

“What the Vatican has said until now has been all lies,” she says. The Reverend Schanker agrees, saying, “Tonight I fear only for the archbishop’s life because any institution built on such falsehood will crumble no matter what. This isn’t the Middle Ages. If the Vatican wants to do the right thing, they should let Milingo speak for himself.” A Baptist minister who supports Milingo’s wife has stated that, “The archbishop’s silence leads us to believe that his human rights are being violated.”

Am I the only one who thinks that this all is kind of kinky? Here we have a battle of two churches: one church that orders its priests not to get married and another church that not only orders its members to get married but tells them who to marry, conducting communal weddings in hotels. The priest, even after getting married, is pursued by the leader of the first church, who us upset and jealous that the priest put marriage ahead of obedience to the church. The honeymoon is hardly over before the priest abandons his wife, who may now be be pregnant, to pledge his renewed faithfulness to the Pope, promising to be a good, obedient servant to him! When the priest’s wife starts a hunger strike just in order to see her husband and talk to him about their marriage, the Pope still won’t allow them to meet. Apparently, the Pope is willing to let a wife starve before she can be in the presence of her husband.

Read the rest of this entry »

Thou Shalt Not Pray in Public! – Bible Secret 3

June 29, 2008

It’s tricky to make generalizations about Christians. After all, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of independent Christian sects, each one formed by followers who believed that all the other Christian sects were not following the proper Christian path. Such widespread lack of aggreement is remarkable given that the heart of Christian dogma is the assertion that the Bible is the single written text of divinely-revealed truth. If all Christians accept the same book as the word of God, containing absolutely unquestionablew instructions about how to live in the correct way, how come Christians end up dividing themselves into competing groups according to their disagreements about the right way to live?

One explanation is that the Bible is poorly written, with vague instructions, faulty logic, and an inconsistent collection of messages which contradict each other. Another explanation is that Chrisitians don’t really base their religious lives upon the teachings of the Bible.

The latter explanation is supported by the public, ostentatious manner in which most Christians pray. The Bible is very clear in what it says about the proper way for Christians to pray, stating in the Gospel of Matthew chapter 6, verses 5-6,

When thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

Read the rest of this entry »

The UnChristian Ostentation of Religious Charities – Bible Secret 2

June 29, 2008


In one of his characteristic awkwardly improvised responses to a question that any intelligent adult should be able to answer without much consideration, George W. Bush answered, “Jesus Christ”. The question: who was his favorite political philosopher. Jesus a political philosopher, huh? Well, I thought that Jesus was famous for saying that we ought to keep the things for God and Caesar separate, but I guess if I had to try to construct a coherent political philosophy out of the ramblings attributed to Jesus, I’d look to the Sermon on the Mount, commonly identified as the foundation of all of the teachings of Jesus.

This is where things get confusing for me. On the one hand, George W. says that Jesus is his favorite political philosopher. On the other hand, as President he advocates policies that directly contradict the teachings that Jesus is reported to have given during the most important sermon of his short career.

What I’m saying may confuse you if you adopt the popular conceptions of Christianity. On the other hand, if you’ve actually read the Bible, you’ll know what I’m talking about: The book of Matthew chapter 6, verses 1-6. Look it up, now. That’s where Jesus instructs his listeners,

Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: that thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

In sum, these Biblical verses give the following message: don’t make a big deal about it when you do charitable acts. Don’t do them in front of others in order to impress them, Jesus says, even when your charity is done in a holy place. In fact, you shouldn’t let anyone else know of your charity. It should be kept private and individual, even to the extent to which you shouldn’t focus on your actions too much within yourself.

Read the rest of this entry »

Genocide – Bible secret 1

June 29, 2008


Christians like to tell the rest of us that their religion teaches peace, love and understanding. They also are fond of saying that the Bible is the greatest book ever written. Well, folks, they can’t have it both ways. The fact is that the Bible promotes genocide, the systematic destruction of entire populations of human beings. If that’s Christian compassion, then I’m the Pope.

Don’t believe that the Bible teaches genocide? Check out the following verses, just two of the many from the Bible that suggest that God himself thinks that genocide is a wonderful idea:

Observe what I command you this day. Behold, I am driving out from before you the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Hittite and the Perizzite and the Hivite and the Jebusite. Take heed to yourself, lest you make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land where you are going, lest it be a snare in your midst. But you shall destroy their altars, break their sacred pillars, and cut down their wooden images (For you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.)

Exodus, Chapter 34, verses 11-14

You will chase your enemies, and they shall fall by the sword before you. Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight; your enemies shall fall by the sword before you. For I will look on you favorably and make you fruitful, multiply you and confirm My covenant with you. You shall eat the old harvest, and clear out the old because of the new.

Leviticus, Chapter 26, verses 7-9

So this is God’s love: if he looks favorably upon you, he’ll help you go out and slaughter ten thousand people just because they belong to another ethic group and are already living on the land you want for yourself. Furthermore, the Bible says that he wants you to go out and commit cultural genocide, destroying the religious buildings and holy objects of rival religions. So come on, Christians! Hop to it! Surely you believe that the Bible is the inspired word of God, don’t you? I’ll bet you can find some non-Christian temple and start your pillage today!

If you think I’m being sarcastic, or am just making an academic point about a couple of long-forgotten verses that have no connection to the way that Christianity is practiced today, you’re wrong. These biblical verses, and others like them, have been used by Christians for thousands of years to justify hundreds, if not thousands, of horrific acts of genocide. Just in the last couple of years, the Christian Yugoslav government led by the popular leader Slobodan Milosevic slaughtered huge numbers of ethnic Albanian Muslims, citing the Bible’s genocidal language as justification.

Read the rest of this entry »